In anticipation of the Marches for Life in SF and DC, the cover article of this weekend's NYTimes Magazine tries to get mileage out of the new alliance between pro-abortion advocates and the neo-Darwinians. It's such a ridiculous piece of journalism. Sure, I'll give you your quack pro-life scientists who unscientifically claim the existence of a psychiatrically diagnosable post-abortion trauma syndrome.
But give me a break -- pro-lifers don't base their opposition to abortion on these claims nor do we base our understanding of science on their methodology. The academic experts could conjure up a study demonstrating the healthy psychological effects of abortions and it would say nothing about its morality -- which, hello Left, is what the fuss is ultimately about.
The Left continues to discredit itself with their cheap, paltry attacks on pro-lifers.
